主被动复合激光距离选通探测系统最大作用距离的推算

范有臣; 赵洪利; 孙华燕; 郭惠超; 赵延仲

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

主被动复合激光距离选通探测系统最大作用距离的推算

范有臣, 赵洪利, 孙华燕, 郭惠超, 赵延仲

文章导航 > 红外与激光工程 > 2015 > 44(S1): 86-92

范有臣, 赵洪利, 孙华燕, 郭惠超, 赵延仲. 主被动复合激光距离选通探测系统最大作用距离的推算[J]. 红外与激光工程, 2015, 44(S1): 86-92.

引用本文:

范有臣, 赵洪利, 孙华燕, 郭惠超, 赵延仲. 主被动复合激光距离选通探测系统最大作用距离的推算[J]. 红外与激光工程, 2015, 44(S1): 86-92.

Fan Youchen, Zhao Hongli, Sun Huayan, Guo Huichao, Zhao Yanzhong. Calculation of maximum range of active and passive laser range-gated detection system[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2015, 44(S1): 86-92.

Citation:

Fan Youchen, Zhao Hongli, Sun Huayan, Guo Huichao, Zhao Yanzhong. Calculation of maximum range of active and passive laser range-gated detection system[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2015, 44(S1): 86-92.

主被动复合激光距离选通探测系统最大作用距离的推算

1.
装备学院光电装备系,北京 101416

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金(61302183)

详细信息

作者简介:
范有臣(1987-),男,博士生,主要从事光电信息处理、激光图像处理等方面的研究。Email:love193777@sina.com

中图分类号: TP391.9

Calculation of maximum range of active and passive laser range-gated detection system

1.
Department of Photoelectric Equipment,Academy of Equipment,Beijing 101416,China

摘要: 主被动复合激光距离选通探测系统的最大作用距离包括可见光/红外系统的最远探测距离和激光系统最远成像距离,分别对其进行建模分析,建立函数表达式,分析了探测器灵敏度和发射功率、激光发射角及大气能见度对最大作用距离的影响,并搭建了532 nm YAG激光器和860 ns固体激光器两套距离选通实验系统,仿真分析系统最远作用距离分别为11.2 km和5.5 km,采用YAG激光器分别对15.7 km、10.9 km、13 km目标成像,采用固体激光器分别对1.3 km、5.1 km、6 km目标成像,通过对比验证了系统的最远距离,实验结果表明,理论计算的最远作用距离与实际最远作用距离基本相符,最远作用距离函数能够反映系统的实际性能,可以作为系统评价的基本参考,是系统设计的重要参考依据。
- 最大作用距离 /
- 主被动复合 /
- 激光主动成像 /
- 距离选通
Abstract: The maximum range of active and passive laser range-gated detection system consists of the most far detection range of the visible/infrared system and the laser system. The furthest distance function of visible/infrared detector and the laser imaging were established respectively. The influence of the detector sensitivity, the transmission power, the laser emission angle and the atmospheric visibility on the maximum range was simulated. Two sets of range-gated system of 532 nm YAG laser and 860 nm solid-state laser were established. Simulation analysis system farthest distance is 11.2 km and 5.5 km respectively. 15.7 km, 10.9 km and 13 km targets are imaged using YAG laser. 1.3 km, 5.1 km and 6 km targets are imaged using solid-state laser. The most remote of the system is verified by comparing the distance between the targets. The experimental results show that the furthest distance from the theoretical calculation is basically consistent with the actual distance. The furthest distance function can reflect the actual performance of the system. It can be used as the basic reference for the evaluation of the system and it is an important reference for the design of the system.
- most far detection range /
- active and passive /
- laser active imaging /
- range-gated technology

[1]
[2]	Guo Huichao, Sun Huayan, Du Lin. Range information calculation method for 3D imaging based on serial images by time-slice technology[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2012, 41(12): 3258-3262. (in Chinese)
[3]
[4]	Mu Jinlong, Wang Qi, Li Qi, et al. Target detection emulation on long-wave infrared active-passive imaging[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2006, 35(5): 634-638. (in Chinese)
[5]
[6]	Shi Chunbo, Ma Xianhua. Analysis of the detecting visual field influenced on the operating distance of the laser fuse[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2007, 36(6): 368-371. (in Chinese)
[7]	Wu Lin, Zhou Zhongliang, Zhou Bing, He Yongqiang. Research on the operating range of imaging type[J]. Laser Infrared, 2008, 38(12): 1192-1195. (in Chinese)
[8]
[9]
[10]	Li Haiyan. Operating range estimation for laser active jamming system[J]. Laser Infrared, 2011, 41(4): 416-420. (in Chinese)
[11]	He Ting, Niu Yanxiong, Zhang Peng, et al. Study on active laser detection distance[J]. Laser Technology, 2012, 36(2): 217-220. (in Chinese)
[12]
[13]
[14]	Peng Xiaodong, Liu Bo, Meng Xin, et al. Research on remote sensing image generation modeling in the visible regions[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2011, 40(7): 1106-1111. (in Chinese)
[15]	Zhao Bin. Active-Passive hybrid detection of short-distance noncooperative space targets[D]. Beijing: Beijing Institute of Technology, 2010: 70-100. (in Chinese)
[16]
[17]
[18]	Repasi Endre, Lutzmanna Peter, Steinvall Ove, et al. Mono-and bi-static SWIR range-gated imaging experiments for ground applications [C]//SPIE, 2008, 7114: 71140D.
[19]	Qiao Jian. Analysis on detection ability of shipborne optical-electronic equipment[J]. Optics and Precision Engineering, 2013, 21(10): 2510-2526. (in Chinese)

[1]	孙倩, 沈振民, 杨颂, 王子豪, 王元庆, 梁琨, 尚卫东, 王培培, 俞越, 赵号, 吕红, 刘正坤, 郑永超. 星载海洋剖面多要素探测技术与系统研究 . 红外与激光工程, 2024, 53(1): 20230466-1-20230466-13. doi: 10.3788/IRLA20230466
[2]	郑丽霞, 刘高龙, 吴金, 孙伟锋. 多功能红外焦平面读出电路设计 . 红外与激光工程, 2022, 51(12): 20220139-1-20220139-7. doi: 10.3788/IRLA20220139
[3]	朱建春, 李欣, 朱威. 流动卫星激光测距系统的距离选通实现方法 . 红外与激光工程, 2022, 51(12): 20220200-1-20220200-11. doi: 10.3788/IRLA20220200
[4]	母一宁, 郝国印, 刘春阳, 刘德兴, 曹喆. 波导栅型微孔阵列的自触发瞬时选通成像研究（特邀） . 红外与激光工程, 2019, 48(4): 402002-0402002(4). doi: 10.3788/IRLA201948.0402002
[5]	孙华燕, 郭惠超, 范有臣, 王帅. 激光主动成像中的BRDF特性 . 红外与激光工程, 2017, 46(S1): 18-23. doi: 10.3788/IRLA201746.S106004
[6]	游瑞蓉, 王新伟, 周燕. 水下距离选通成像多分辨率爬山自动聚焦法 . 红外与激光工程, 2016, 45(7): 726003-0726003(6). doi: 10.3788/IRLA201645.0726003
[7]	王新伟, 刘晓泉, 游瑞蓉, 范松涛, 何军, 周燕. 距离选通超分辨率三维成像及其应用 . 红外与激光工程, 2016, 45(8): 824001-0824001(8). doi: 10.3788/IRLA201645.0824001
[8]	范有臣, 赵洪利, 孙华燕, 郭惠超, 赵延仲. 互相关算法在运动目标距离选通激光三维成像中的应用 . 红外与激光工程, 2016, 45(6): 617003-0617003(9). doi: 10.3788/IRLA201645.0617003
[9]	范有臣, 赵洪利, 孙华燕, 郭惠超, 赵延仲. 激光主动成像结合距离选通技术的零时信号测量方法 . 红外与激光工程, 2016, 45(3): 306004-0306004(7). doi: 10.3788/IRLA201645.0306004
[10]	胡玲, 王霞, 延波, 李帅帅. 水下距离选通成像系统调制传递函数模型分析 . 红外与激光工程, 2015, 44(11): 3262-3269.
[11]	王森, 潘玉寨, 刘一, 杨宝森, 曲士良. 提高雾天激光主动成像图像质量的研究 . 红外与激光工程, 2013, 42(9): 2392-2396.
[12]	吴坤, 张合新, 孟飞, 陈聪. 激光主动成像图像噪声抑制方法 . 红外与激光工程, 2013, 42(9): 2397-2402.
[13]	都琳, 李迎春, 郭惠超, 范有臣. 互相关法实现距离选通远距离目标的三维重建 . 红外与激光工程, 2013, 42(7): 1725-1729.
[14]	葛卫龙, 华良洪, 张晓晖. 距离选通水下成像中基于等水体后向散射光能量的目标搜索方法 . 红外与激光工程, 2013, 42(10): 2677-2681.
[15]	葛卫龙, 华良洪, 张晓晖. 距离选通水下激光成像系统信噪比分析与计算 . 红外与激光工程, 2013, 42(8): 2022-2026.
[16]	曹忆南, 王新伟, 周燕. 距离选通激光成像空间定位模糊C均值聚类分割法 . 红外与激光工程, 2013, 42(10): 2682-2686,2696.
[17]	陈超, 杨鸿儒, 吴磊, 俞兵, 袁良, 杨斌, 黎高平. 距离选通成像系统关键性能的实验 . 红外与激光工程, 2013, 42(12): 3423-3427.
[18]	许凯达, 金伟其, 刘敬, 裘溯, 田训卿. 基于激光距离选通成像的非视域成像应用 . 红外与激光工程, 2012, 41(8): 2073-2078.
[19]	王磊, 徐智勇, 张启衡, 王华闯. 蓝绿激光水下成像系统的探测灵敏度分析 . 红外与激光工程, 2012, 41(1): 79-84.
[20]	李东, 杨华军, 郑秋贞, 邓志辉. 距离选通技术在三维成像激光雷达中的应用研究 . 红外与激光工程, 2012, 41(1): 85-88.

点击查看大图

计量

文章访问数: 330
HTML全文浏览量: 31
PDF下载量: 151
被引次数: 0

主被动复合激光距离选通探测系统最大作用距离的推算

1. 装备学院光电装备系,北京 101416

作者简介:
范有臣(1987-),男,博士生,主要从事光电信息处理、激光图像处理等方面的研究。Email:love193777@sina.com

收稿日期: 2015-11-13
修回日期: 2015-12-15
刊出日期: 2016-01-25

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金(61302183)

中图分类号: TP391.9

关键词:

摘要: 主被动复合激光距离选通探测系统的最大作用距离包括可见光/红外系统的最远探测距离和激光系统最远成像距离,分别对其进行建模分析,建立函数表达式,分析了探测器灵敏度和发射功率、激光发射角及大气能见度对最大作用距离的影响,并搭建了532 nm YAG激光器和860 ns固体激光器两套距离选通实验系统,仿真分析系统最远作用距离分别为11.2 km和5.5 km,采用YAG激光器分别对15.7 km、10.9 km、13 km目标成像,采用固体激光器分别对1.3 km、5.1 km、6 km目标成像,通过对比验证了系统的最远距离,实验结果表明,理论计算的最远作用距离与实际最远作用距离基本相符,最远作用距离函数能够反映系统的实际性能,可以作为系统评价的基本参考,是系统设计的重要参考依据。

English Abstract

Calculation of maximum range of active and passive laser range-gated detection system

1. Department of Photoelectric Equipment,Academy of Equipment,Beijing 101416,China

Received Date: 2015-11-13
Rev Recd Date: 2015-12-15
Publish Date: 2016-01-25

Keywords:

Abstract: The maximum range of active and passive laser range-gated detection system consists of the most far detection range of the visible/infrared system and the laser system. The furthest distance function of visible/infrared detector and the laser imaging were established respectively. The influence of the detector sensitivity, the transmission power, the laser emission angle and the atmospheric visibility on the maximum range was simulated. Two sets of range-gated system of 532 nm YAG laser and 860 nm solid-state laser were established. Simulation analysis system farthest distance is 11.2 km and 5.5 km respectively. 15.7 km, 10.9 km and 13 km targets are imaged using YAG laser. 1.3 km, 5.1 km and 6 km targets are imaged using solid-state laser. The most remote of the system is verified by comparing the distance between the targets. The experimental results show that the furthest distance from the theoretical calculation is basically consistent with the actual distance. The furthest distance function can reflect the actual performance of the system. It can be used as the basic reference for the evaluation of the system and it is an important reference for the design of the system.