留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

Development of coaxiality measurement system of turbine components and stud standard parts

Zhang Bo Zhang Wengjian Lei Lihua

张波, 张文建, 雷李华. 涡轮部件及螺柱标准件同轴度测量系统的研制[J]. 红外与激光工程, 2020, 49(10): 20200216. doi: 10.3788/IRLA20200216
引用本文: 张波, 张文建, 雷李华. 涡轮部件及螺柱标准件同轴度测量系统的研制[J]. 红外与激光工程, 2020, 49(10): 20200216. doi: 10.3788/IRLA20200216
Zhang Bo, Zhang Wengjian, Lei Lihua. Development of coaxiality measurement system of turbine components and stud standard parts[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2020, 49(10): 20200216. doi: 10.3788/IRLA20200216
Citation: Zhang Bo, Zhang Wengjian, Lei Lihua. Development of coaxiality measurement system of turbine components and stud standard parts[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2020, 49(10): 20200216. doi: 10.3788/IRLA20200216

涡轮部件及螺柱标准件同轴度测量系统的研制

doi: 10.3788/IRLA20200216
详细信息
  • 中图分类号: O484, TB921

Development of coaxiality measurement system of turbine components and stud standard parts

More Information
    Author Bio:

    张波(1983-),男,高级工程师,硕士,主要从事精密测量与标准化方面的研究。Email:zhangbo@simt.com.cn

    Corresponding author: 雷李华(1985-),男,高级工程师,博士,主要从事纳米几何测量技术方面的研究。Email:leilh@simt.com.cn
  • 摘要: 涡轮增压器与变速箱在精密机械制造行业中应用广泛,涡轮部件及螺柱标准件的尺寸准确度是涡轮增压器和变速箱装配精度的一个重要保证,其中同轴度是涡轮部件及螺柱标准件尺寸准确度的一个关键参数,根据涡轮部件及螺柱标准件的同轴度测量需求,研制了一套涡轮部件及螺柱标准件同轴度的测量系统,并基于LabVIEW开发了测量软件。通过实验对螺柱标准件M12的同轴度进行测量并完成测量不确定度评定。实验结果显示四次测量得到的同轴度误差在6.3~6.5 μm,扩展不确定度达2.6 μm,结论表明:研制的同轴度测量系统适用于涡轮部件及螺柱标准件同轴度的高精度测量。
  • Figure  1.  Testing fixture for measuring coaxiality

    1-guide rail measuring mechanism; 2-inductance probe; 3-base; 4-three-needle probe

    Figure  2.  First measurement data

    Figure  3.  Second measurement data

    Figure  4.  Third measurement data

    Figure  5.  Fourth measurement data

    Table  1.   Measurement uncertainty source and the summary of calculate results

    No.Measurement Uncertainty Source$ui$Evaluation typeDistribution type$ui$/μm
    1Repeatability$u(\left| {{M_{\rm{a}}} - {M_{\rm{b}}}} \right|)$A/0.2
    Resolution$u({\delta _{\left| {{{\rm{M}}_{\rm{a}}}{\rm{ - }}{{\rm{M}}_{\rm{b}}}} \right|}})$Buniformiy0.03
    2Indication error of inductance micrometer$u(\Delta \left| {{M_{\rm{a}}} - {M_{\rm{b}}}} \right|)$B/0.2
    3Temperature$u({\delta _{\rm{t}}})$Buniformiyneglected
    Expansion factor$u({\delta _{\rm{\alpha }}})$Buniformiyneglected
    4Force of measurement$u({F_{\left| {{{\rm{M}}_{\rm{a}}}{\rm{ - }}{{\rm{M}}_{\rm{b}}}} \right|}})$Buniformiyneglected
    5Three-needle form error$u({x_{\left| {{{\rm{M}}_{\rm{a}}}{\rm{ - }}{{\rm{M}}_{\rm{b}}}} \right|}})$BTwo-point0.71
    6Installation error$u(\Delta P)$BTwo-point1
    $u(\Delta S)$Buniformiyneglected
    7Mechanism error$u(\Delta C)$Buniformiyneglected
    $u(\Delta D)$Buniformiyneglected
    Combined standard uncertainty: ${u_c}$1.26
    Expanded uncertainty(k=2): U2.6
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] Djamal Hissein Didane, Nurhayati Rosly, Mohd Fadhli Zulkafli, et al. Performance evaluation of a novel vertical axis wind turbine with coaxial contra-rotating concept [J]. Renewable Energy, 2018: 353-361.
    [2] David Gordon, Tirupati Bolisetti, David S-K Ting, et al. Experimental and analytical investigation on pipe sizes for a coaxial borehole heat exchanger [J]. Renewable Energy, 2018, 144: 946-953.
    [3] Janne Peltonen, Matti Murtomaa, Aleksi Saikkonen, et al. A coaxial probe with a vertically split outer sensor for charge and dimensional measurement of a passing object [J]. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 2016, 244: 44-49.
    [4] Gheribi Hassina, Boukebbab Salim. Contribution to the evaluation of uncertainties of measurement to the data processing sequence of a CMM[C]//International Conference Design and Modeling of Mechanical Systems, 2018.
    [5] Arencibia Rosenda Valdés, Souza Cláudio Costa, Costa H L, et al. Simplified model to estimate un-certainty in CMM [J]. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences & Engineering, 2015, 37(1): 411-421.
    [6] Roy R, Stark R, Tracht K, et al. Continuous maintenance and the future—Foundations and technological challenges [J]. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 2016, 65(2): 667-688. doi:  10.1016/j.cirp.2016.06.006
    [7] Ghadiri Majid, Shafiei Navvab. Vibration analysis of a nano-turbine blade based on Eringen nonlocal elasticity applying the differential quadrature method [J]. Journal of Vibration and Control, 2017, 19(23): 3247-3265.
    [8] Rezaeiha Abdolrahim, Kalkman Ivo, Blocken Bert. Effect of pitch angle on power performance and aerodynamics of a vertical axis wind turbine [J]. Applied Energy, 2017, 197: 132-150.
    [9] Rezaeiha Abdolrahim, Kalkman Ivo, Blocken Bert. Guidelines for minimum domain size and azimuthal increment [J]. Renewable Energy, 2017, 107: 373-385.
    [10] Anselmi Amedeo, Collin Sophie, Haigron Pasca. Device-specific evaluation of intraventricular left ventricular assist device position by quantitative coaxiality analysis [J]. Journal of Surgical Research, 2017, 213: 110-114.
    [11] Wagner Rozenn, Michael Stephen, Pedersen Troels F. Uncertainty of power curve measurement with a two-beam nacelle-mounted lida [J]. Wind Energy, 2016, 7(19): 1269-1287.
    [12] Grzadziela A, Musial J, Muslewski L, et al. A method for identification of non-coaxiality in engine shaft lines of a selected type of naval ships [J]. Polish Maritime Research, 2015, 22(1): 65-71. doi:  10.1515/pomr-2015-0009
    [13] Shaverdi H , Taha M R , Kalantary F. A flow rule incorporating the fabric and non-coaxiality in granular material [J]. Granular Matter, 2014, 16(5): 675-685.
    [14] Criel P, Reybrouck N, Caspeele R. Uncertainty quantification of creep in concrete by Taylor expansion [J]. Engineering Structures, 2017, 153: 334-341.
    [15] Sfakis Lauren, Kamaldinov Tim, Larsen Melinda. Quantification of confocal images using LabVIEW for tissue engineering applications [J]. Tissue Engineering Part c-Methods, 2016, 11(12): 1028-1037.
  • [1] 杨天杭, 张春明, 左丰华, 胡勇, 顾明剑.  基于FY-3E星载红外观测的交叉定标匹配不确定性分析 . 红外与激光工程, 2023, 52(4): 20220616-1-20220616-12. doi: 10.3788/IRLA20220616
    [2] 肖智茹, 牛青林, 王振华, 董士奎.  来流导致的火箭发动机喷焰红外辐射强度不确定度量化分析 . 红外与激光工程, 2023, 52(4): 20220621-1-20220621-10. doi: 10.3788/IRLA20220621
    [3] 李小明, 朱国帅, 郭名航, 刘赢泽, 张崇.  基于光学自准直的旋转轴平行度测量与不确定度分析 . 红外与激光工程, 2023, 52(5): 20220794-1-20220794-12. doi: 10.3788/IRLA20220794
    [4] Yuan Chunyu, Cao Yang, Deng Yong, Zhang Shulian.  Improving the measurement accuracy of refractive index of GaAs and Sapphire Crystal by laser feedback interferometry . 红外与激光工程, 2022, 51(3): 20210400-1-20210400-7. doi: 10.3788/IRLA20210400
    [5] 黄思佳, 袁银麟, 翟文超, 郑小兵, 雷正刚, 林宇.  噪声等效光谱辐亮度定标系统的性能测评 . 红外与激光工程, 2022, 51(12): 20220509-1-20220509-10. doi: 10.3788/IRLA20220509
    [6] 宋鲁明, 张福民, 孙栋, 林洪沂, 黄晓桦, 于淼, 张乾.  基于可调谐激光器扫频干涉绝对距离测量方法研究进展 . 红外与激光工程, 2022, 51(5): 20210406-1-20210406-15. doi: 10.3788/IRLA20210406
    [7] Wang Yichao, Zhang Zheng, Huang Haizhou, Lin Wenxiong.  Particle auto-statistics and measurement of the spherical powder for 3D printing based on deep learning . 红外与激光工程, 2021, 50(10): 2021G004-1-2021G004-10. doi: 10.3788/IRLA2021G004
    [8] Ma Jinyu, Chen Xin, Ding Guoqing, Chen Jigang.  Research on angle setting error of diameter measurement based on laser displacement sensors . 红外与激光工程, 2021, 50(5): 20200316-1-20200316-7. doi: 10.3788/IRLA20200316
    [9] Yang Xiuwei, Zhang Dehai, Xiao Zhongjun, Li Xiangdong, Zhang Lin.  Effect of surface roughness on THz reflection measurement . 红外与激光工程, 2021, 50(3): 20200209-1-20200209-7. doi: 10.3788/IRLA20200209
    [10] Song Limei, Huang Haozhen, Chen Yang, Zhu Xinjun, Yang Yangang, Guo Qinghua.  Fast measurement of human body posture based on three-dimensional optical information . 红外与激光工程, 2020, 49(6): 20200079-1-20200079-10. doi: 10.3788/IRLA20200079
    [11] Liu Lu, Xi Dongdong, Cheng Lei, Wang Yuwei, Cai Bolin, Zhou Huiyu.  Enhanced Gray-code method for three-dimensional shape measurement . 红外与激光工程, 2020, 49(11): 20200314-1-20200314-8. doi: 10.3788/IRLA20200314
    [12] 龙亮, 张丽莎, 吴立民.  甚高灵敏度长波红外相机测试技术 . 红外与激光工程, 2018, 47(5): 504001-0504001(6). doi: 10.3788/IRLA201847.0504001
    [13] 庞伟伟, 郑小兵, 李健军, 史学舜, 吴浩宇, 夏茂鹏, 高东阳, 史剑民, 戚涛, 康晴.  溯源于低温辐射计的1064nm波段探测器绝对光谱响应度定标 . 红外与激光工程, 2015, 44(12): 3812-3818.
    [14] 韩启金, 张学文, 乔志远, 杨磊, 潘志强, 刘李.  高分一号卫星PMS 相机多场地宽动态辐射定标 . 红外与激光工程, 2015, 44(1): 127-133.
    [15] 周跃, 闫丰, 章明朝.  CCD光电参数测试系统的研制 . 红外与激光工程, 2014, 43(10): 3451-3456.
    [16] 林冠宇, 于向阳.  高精度智能化可见/近红外积分球辐射定标装置 . 红外与激光工程, 2014, 43(8): 2520-2525.
    [17] 肖韶荣, 周洁, 赵静, 黄新.  温度对激光光斑跟踪不确定度的影响 . 红外与激光工程, 2013, 42(3): 605-610.
    [18] 代雷, 隋永新, 吴迪.  基于激光干涉法的曲率半径精密检测系统 . 红外与激光工程, 2013, 42(8): 2221-2225.
  • 加载中
图(5) / 表(1)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  301
  • HTML全文浏览量:  87
  • PDF下载量:  22
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2020-06-04
  • 修回日期:  2020-07-14
  • 网络出版日期:  2020-11-03
  • 刊出日期:  2020-11-03

Development of coaxiality measurement system of turbine components and stud standard parts

doi: 10.3788/IRLA20200216
    作者简介:

    张波(1983-),男,高级工程师,硕士,主要从事精密测量与标准化方面的研究。Email:zhangbo@simt.com.cn

    通讯作者: 雷李华(1985-),男,高级工程师,博士,主要从事纳米几何测量技术方面的研究。Email:leilh@simt.com.cn
  • 中图分类号: O484, TB921

摘要: 涡轮增压器与变速箱在精密机械制造行业中应用广泛,涡轮部件及螺柱标准件的尺寸准确度是涡轮增压器和变速箱装配精度的一个重要保证,其中同轴度是涡轮部件及螺柱标准件尺寸准确度的一个关键参数,根据涡轮部件及螺柱标准件的同轴度测量需求,研制了一套涡轮部件及螺柱标准件同轴度的测量系统,并基于LabVIEW开发了测量软件。通过实验对螺柱标准件M12的同轴度进行测量并完成测量不确定度评定。实验结果显示四次测量得到的同轴度误差在6.3~6.5 μm,扩展不确定度达2.6 μm,结论表明:研制的同轴度测量系统适用于涡轮部件及螺柱标准件同轴度的高精度测量。

English Abstract

    • In recent years, with the development of the national economy and the transformation of industrial structure, as well as the increasing development of mechanical manufacturing, the manufacturers and customers of mechanical products are processing quality of mechanical products. Meanwhile, the requirements of assembly accuracy and the quality of products are higher[1]. Turbocharger and gearbox are widely used in mechanical industry, and stud standard parts are universally used in turbocharger and gearbox. In order to ensure the assembly accuracy of turbocharger and gearbox, it is necessary to ensure the dimensional accuracy of turbine components and stud standard parts, because coaxiality is an important parameter to measure the dimensional accuracy of turbocharger and gearbox[2].

      Aiming at the blank of coaxiality measurement of turbine components and stud standard parts without center hole, a method of measuring coaxiality of turbine components and stud standard parts is applied in this paper. In order to measure the coaxiality, the testing fixture and using virtual instrument was designed. The testing fixture of coaxiality measurement instrument can accomplish the measurement of thread coaxiality and solve the traceability value problem of important parts in the mechanical industry.

    • The testing fixture of coxiality measurement of turbine parts and stud standard parts comprise the base, V type clamping mechanism, guide rail measuring mechanism and inductance probe[3].

      The base is the foundation of the whole testing fixture. The V-type clamping mechanism and the guide rail measuring device are fixed on the base. The two inductance probes are fixed at the same height as the stud standard parts. The whole structure of the tester is shown in Fig. 1. When the coaxial degree of the tested standard part is measured with the testing fixture, the cylindrical part of the tested standard part is pressed on the V-shaped frame. When the rolling bearing drives the measured standard part to rotate along the circumference, the thread drives the stylus to move along the axis of the standard part with the speed of one pitch per cycle, the V-type clamping mechanism is made of cemented carbide. The standard parts of the stud have different specifications, according to the specification of the thread. Several kinds of optimum three-needle diameters are calculated to meet the requirement of coaxial measurement of stud standard parts[4].

      Figure 1.  Testing fixture for measuring coaxiality

      In this paper, the differential inductive displacement sensor is chosen, and the type DG03 inductance probe, which is made by Sanmenxia Zhongyuan Measuring Instrument Co. Ltd., is used. The resolution is 0.1 μm, the measuring range is ±1.0 mm, and the sensitivity of output voltage is 70 mV/mm. the measuring force of the inductance probe is small. In the range of 0.55– 0.75 N, the deformation is reduced by the measuring force, and the two inductive probes are fixed in the position of the same height as the tested standard parts and perpendicular to the axis of the tested standard parts[5].

    • The data acquisition system consists of the signal processing circuit, data acquisition card and computer software.the sensitivity of the sensor is 70 mV/mm, and the coaxiality of the measured standard parts is several microns, so the output voltage signal of the sensor is only a few millivolts. It is necessary to design a signal conditioning circuit to adjust the output signal of the sensor in order to amplify the output signal of the sensor. In this paper, a high precision operational amplifier is used to amplify the signal. The AD620 instrument amplifier is selected and the required magnification is obtained by two-stage amplifier.

      The signal after the amplification circuit can be read by the data acquisition card. The data acquisition system selects USB5935 data acquisition card, which is based on the USB bus, can be directly inserted in the computer's USB interface, the data can be input into the computer for analysis and processing[6].

      The signal output from the data acquisition card arrives at the computer and is displayed by LabVIEW software. This data acquisition system has designed a graphical display interface with LabVIEW to display the change curve of coaxiality measurement. The maximum value of absolute value after subtracting corresponding points of the two curves (the coaxial value of the tested standard parts) is shown. The producer/consumer mode in LabVIEW programming is adopted in this system. The producer cycle is data generation/acquisition and the data is generated and placed in the data buffer. When the consumer cycle is required for data display/analysis, data is pulled from the data buffer to perform relevant analysis operations [7].

      The data acquisition system mainly includes two modules: data acquisition setup and data acquisition with result display. The data acquisition system includes channel setting, timing setting, and recording setting. Data acquisition setup is mainly for the channel of data acquisition system, connection terminal configuration, and maximum/minimum voltage. Timing set is mainly for the data acquisition system sampling clock source, sampling number, Sampling mode, sampling rate etc. The record setting is mainly set by the recording mode of the acquisition system and the path of the TDMS file used to record the data[8].

    • The main purpose of this experiment is to measure the stud standard part M12. The measurement is carried out in the laboratory of temperature (20 ±0.3) ℃ and humidity of 53% RH. In the actual measurement, according to the thread specification of the tested standard part, the measuring needle with the corresponding diameter is selected. And it is fixed on the guide rail measuring device. Adjusting the guide rail perpendicular to the axis of the tested standard parts, in order to ensure that the measuring needle has the appropriate measuring force. A small round bar with a cylindrical degree of fewer than 0.5 μm is fixed on the V-shaped frame. The measuring needle is pressed on the small round bar and the direction of the guide rail is adjusted so that the left and right guideways are bounded by LabVIEW in the course of the 20 mm travel. The maximum value of surface display is less than 1 μm, which can make the error of coaxiality measurement less than 1 μm because the reference axis of guide rail and stud standard part is not parallel. Then, the cylindrical part of M12 standard part of the tested stud is put forward[9]. Press it on the V-type frame, Put the needle in the thread, reset the device, drive the rolling bearing, make the measured standard part rotate evenly, and the difference between the right and left side of the inductance micrometer is taken as the coaxial error of the measured standard part. The average value is calculated as the result of the coaxiality measurement.

      The measurement of standard stud M12 has been done for four times, and the experimental results are shown in Figs.2-5. The vertical coordinates in the figure are the difference between the values of the two sides of the inductance micrometer (t).

      Figure 2.  First measurement data

      Figure 3.  Second measurement data

      Figure 4.  Third measurement data

      Figure 5.  Fourth measurement data

      Figure 2-5 show that the t(max) obtained by four times measurement is in the range of 6.3–6.5 μm. The experimental results show that the coaxial measuring instrument has good repeatability under the same experimental conditions[10].

    • Measurement model

      $$t = \left| {{M_a} - {M_b}} \right|$$

      Where, $t$ is coaxiality error; ${M_a}$ is inductance sensor indication of the left side; ${M_b}$ is inductance sensor indication of the right side.

      The uncertainty source of input including:

      (1) Standard uncertainty induced by repeatability of the coaxiality of turbine components and stud standard part $u(\left| {{M_a} - {M_b}} \right|)$;

      (2) Standard uncertainty induced by resolution of inductance probe $u({\delta _{\left| {{M_a} - {M_b}} \right|}})$;

      (3) Standard uncertainty induced by indication error of inductance probe $u(\Delta \left| {{M_a} - {M_b}} \right|)$;

      (4) Standard uncertainty induced by expansion coefficient difference u(δa)[11];

      (5) Standard uncertainty induced by temperature difference u(δt);

      (6) Standard uncertainty induced by force measurement $u({F_{\left| {{M_a} - {M_b}} \right|}})$;

      (7) Standard uncertainty induced by shape error of three needle $u({x_{\left| {{M_a} - {M_b}} \right|}})$;

      (8) Standard uncertainty induced by non parallel reference axis of the guide rail and stud standard parts $u(\Delta P)$[12];

      (9) Standard uncertainty induced by the reference axis which is out of vertical of the standard parts of the inductance probe and stud $u(\Delta S)$;

      (10) Standard uncertainty induced by the measurement of the planeness of the interface due to the slight movement of the parallelogram mechanism up and down during the measurement $u(\Delta C)$[13];

      (11) The uncertainty induced by the deviation between the measured value and the actual value due to the trace movement of the parallelogram mechanism in the measurement $u(\Delta D)$[14];

      The standard uncertainty above are independent.

      The Combined uncertainty is:

      $$\begin{split} uc =& \displaystyle\sum\limits_{i = 1}^n {\sqrt u i} = \\ & \sqrt {{{0.2}^2} + {1^2} + {{0.71}^2} + {{002}^2}} = 1.26 \;\text{μ} {\rm{m}} \\ \end{split} $$

      So the expanded uncertainty (k=2) is:

      $$U = k{u_c} = 2 \times 1.26 = 2.52 \approx 2.6\; \text{μ} {\rm{m}}$$

      Measurement uncertainty source and the summary of calculate results is shown in Tab.1.

      Table 1.  Measurement uncertainty source and the summary of calculate results

      No.Measurement Uncertainty Source$ui$Evaluation typeDistribution type$ui$/μm
      1Repeatability$u(\left| {{M_{\rm{a}}} - {M_{\rm{b}}}} \right|)$A/0.2
      Resolution$u({\delta _{\left| {{{\rm{M}}_{\rm{a}}}{\rm{ - }}{{\rm{M}}_{\rm{b}}}} \right|}})$Buniformiy0.03
      2Indication error of inductance micrometer$u(\Delta \left| {{M_{\rm{a}}} - {M_{\rm{b}}}} \right|)$B/0.2
      3Temperature$u({\delta _{\rm{t}}})$Buniformiyneglected
      Expansion factor$u({\delta _{\rm{\alpha }}})$Buniformiyneglected
      4Force of measurement$u({F_{\left| {{{\rm{M}}_{\rm{a}}}{\rm{ - }}{{\rm{M}}_{\rm{b}}}} \right|}})$Buniformiyneglected
      5Three-needle form error$u({x_{\left| {{{\rm{M}}_{\rm{a}}}{\rm{ - }}{{\rm{M}}_{\rm{b}}}} \right|}})$BTwo-point0.71
      6Installation error$u(\Delta P)$BTwo-point1
      $u(\Delta S)$Buniformiyneglected
      7Mechanism error$u(\Delta C)$Buniformiyneglected
      $u(\Delta D)$Buniformiyneglected
      Combined standard uncertainty: ${u_c}$1.26
      Expanded uncertainty(k=2): U2.6
    • In this paper, the coaxiality measurement method of turbine components and stud standard parts is taken as the research object, the mechanical design and the software design of the data acquisition system for the coaxiality measuring tools of turbine components and stud standard parts are completed[15]. Then, the measured results of the designed turbine components and stud standard coaxiality measuring tools are verified by experiments. The experimental and measurement uncertainty evaluation results show that the uncertainty of the coaxiality measurement results is 2.6 μm, which reaches the expected goal.

参考文献 (15)

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回