Volume 45 Issue S1
Jun.  2016
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents

Xie Jun, He Fengyun, Wang Jing, Gao Ge, Zhao Tianjiao, Liu Zhenyu. Simulation and optimization of axial supporting structures for theodolite primary mirror[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2016, 45(S1): 132-137. doi: 10.3788/IRLA201645.S118001
Citation: Xie Jun, He Fengyun, Wang Jing, Gao Ge, Zhao Tianjiao, Liu Zhenyu. Simulation and optimization of axial supporting structures for theodolite primary mirror[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2016, 45(S1): 132-137. doi: 10.3788/IRLA201645.S118001

Simulation and optimization of axial supporting structures for theodolite primary mirror

doi: 10.3788/IRLA201645.S118001
  • Received Date: 2016-01-02
  • Rev Recd Date: 2016-02-03
  • Publish Date: 2016-05-25
  • In order to obtain the effect of supporting structures on the surface error of theodolite primary mirror, the topology optimization and parameter analysis of axial supporting structures of primary mirror were performed. First, contact boundary condition was used to establish the detail finite element model of primary mirror supporting structures. The surface error of original supporting structures was analyzed and the surface error RMS was obtained under both horizontal optical axis condition and vertical optical axis condition. Then, a 4D interferometer was used to measure the surface error RMS under lateral supporting condition. Results show that the deviation of surface error RMS of numerical results and experimental results is 13.2%, which verify the accuracy of simulation method. At last, the topology optimization of the primary axial supporting structures was carried out. The new axial supporting structures were made according to the topological configuration. After that, the parameter analysis was carried out on some important dimensions of axial supporting structures. Results show that the primary mirror surface error RMS of optimized supporting structures is obviously better than the original one. The original surface error RMS of axial supporting is 11.49 nm, while the optimized one is 8.38 nm. The research is an important reference to the design of primary mirror supporting structures.
  • [1] Xie Jun, Cao Lihua, Han Guangyu, et al. The surface error analysis of theodolite primary mirror considering contact boundary condition[J]. Acta Photonica Sinica, 2014, 43(12):1212004. (in Chinese) 谢军, 曹立华, 韩光宇, 等. 考虑接触边界条件的经纬仪主镜面形误差分析[J]. 光子学报, 2014, 43(12):1212004.
    [2] Fan Lili, Zhang Jingxu, Yang Fei, et al. Impact of the supports of primary mirror in equatorial telescope on its surface deformation[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2012, 41(1):173-177. (in Chinese) 范李立, 张景旭, 杨飞, 等. 极轴式望远镜主镜支撑结构对镜面变形的影响[J]. 红外与激光工程, 2012, 41(1):173-177.
    [3] Wang Fuguo, Yang Hongbo, Yang Fei, et al. Optimization and analysis for the axis support points position of the large aperture mirrors[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2007, 36(6):877-882. (in chinese) 王富国, 杨洪波, 杨飞, 等. 大口径主镜轴向支撑点位置优化分析[J]. 红外与激光工程, 2007, 36(6):877-882.
    [4] Dong Deyi, Li Zhilai, Li Ruigang, et al. Simulation and experiment of influence of adhesive curing on reflective mirror surface[J]. Optics and Precision Engineering, 2014, 22(9):2451-2457. (in Chinese) 董得义, 李志来, 李锐钢, 等. 胶层固化对反射镜面形影响的仿真与试验[J]. 光学精密工程, 2014, 22(10):2451-2457.
    [5] Sun Hang, Zhang Haibo, Cao Lihua, et al. Error compensation for primary mirror shaking of large aperture optical detection equipment[J]. Optics and Precision Engineering, 2014, 22(1):85-91. (in Chinese) 孙航, 张海波, 曹立华, 等. 大口径光电探测设备主镜晃动的误差补偿[J]. 光学精密工程, 2014, 22(1):85-91.
    [6] Wu Xiaoxia, Li Jianfeng, Song Shumei, et al. Active support system for 4 m SiC lightweight primary mirror[J]. Optics and Precision Engineering, 2014, 22(9):2451-2457. (in Chinese) 吴小霞, 李剑锋, 宋淑梅, 等. 4mSiC轻量化主镜的主动支撑系统[J]. 光学精密工程, 2014, 22(9):2451-2457.
    [7] Tan Fanjiao, Qiao Yanfeng, Li Yaobin, et al. Finite element analysis for surface shape deformation of photo-electronic theodolite primary mirror[J]. Acta Optic Sinica, 2008, 28(4):757-763. (in Chinese) 谭凡教, 乔彦峰, 李耀彬, 等. 光电经纬仪主镜面型变化的有限元分析[J]. 光学学报, 2008, 28(4):757-763.
    [8] San Xiaogang, Sun Ning, Zhuo Renshan, et al. Design of supporting structure for primary mirror of large aperture theodolite[J]. Optics and Precision Engineering, 2013, 21(12):3112-3117. (in Chinese) 伞晓刚, 孙宁, 卓仁善. 大口径光电经纬仪主反射镜支撑结构设计[J]. 光学精密工程, 2013, 21(12):3112-3117.
    [9] Wang Yang, Zhang Jingxu. Optimization and analysis for the support of the large aperture telescope primary mirror[J]. Opto-Electronic Engineering, 2009, 36(1):107-113. (in Chinese) 王洋, 张景旭. 大口径望远镜主镜支撑优化分析[J]. 光电工程, 2009, 36(1):107-113.
    [10] Zhou Chao, Wang Zhi, Zhao Yongzhi, et al. Supporting effect study on primary mirror of ground-based telescope[J]. Opto-Electronic Engineering, 2011, 38(9):84-87. (in Chinese) 周超, 王志, 赵勇志, 等. 地基望远主镜支撑性能分析[J]. 光电工程, 2011, 38(9):84-87.
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(471) PDF downloads(161) Cited by()

Related
Proportional views

Simulation and optimization of axial supporting structures for theodolite primary mirror

doi: 10.3788/IRLA201645.S118001
  • 1. Changchun Institute of Optics,Fine Mechanics and Physics,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Changchun 130033,China;
  • 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China

Abstract: In order to obtain the effect of supporting structures on the surface error of theodolite primary mirror, the topology optimization and parameter analysis of axial supporting structures of primary mirror were performed. First, contact boundary condition was used to establish the detail finite element model of primary mirror supporting structures. The surface error of original supporting structures was analyzed and the surface error RMS was obtained under both horizontal optical axis condition and vertical optical axis condition. Then, a 4D interferometer was used to measure the surface error RMS under lateral supporting condition. Results show that the deviation of surface error RMS of numerical results and experimental results is 13.2%, which verify the accuracy of simulation method. At last, the topology optimization of the primary axial supporting structures was carried out. The new axial supporting structures were made according to the topological configuration. After that, the parameter analysis was carried out on some important dimensions of axial supporting structures. Results show that the primary mirror surface error RMS of optimized supporting structures is obviously better than the original one. The original surface error RMS of axial supporting is 11.49 nm, while the optimized one is 8.38 nm. The research is an important reference to the design of primary mirror supporting structures.

Reference (10)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return