Volume 46 Issue 3
Apr.  2017
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents

Hou Chongyuan, Li Hengnian, Yang Yuan, Lu Yi. Control strategy of space debris collision avoidance using ground based laser system[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2017, 46(3): 329003-0329003(6). doi: 10.3788/IRLA201746.0329003
Citation: Hou Chongyuan, Li Hengnian, Yang Yuan, Lu Yi. Control strategy of space debris collision avoidance using ground based laser system[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2017, 46(3): 329003-0329003(6). doi: 10.3788/IRLA201746.0329003

Control strategy of space debris collision avoidance using ground based laser system

doi: 10.3788/IRLA201746.0329003
  • Received Date: 2016-07-10
  • Rev Recd Date: 2016-08-12
  • Publish Date: 2017-03-25
  • The growing number of space debris threatens the flight safety of manned space station and satellites. In 2011, NASA proposed to use a continuous ground-based laser station irradiation to change orbit of space debris. The photon pressure is slight but durable, and accumulates to a considerable orbit change. The orbit change will avoid the possible collision. This method does not bring the space debris back into the atmosphere, but to prevent the collision. For the method, the spacecraft is no need to maneuver for space debris collision avoidance, and the mild photon pressure just need median power laser generator. Thus, the method gets widespread concern in recent years. However, the head-on irradiation control law in this method is simple, but not the best. It is necessary to design the optimal control law. Through the establishment of two point boundary value model to maximize the distance between two objects for control objectives, and then solving the optimality conditions, the optimal control problem is solved. The simulation shows that the modified control law has been optimized to improve the performance of collision avoidance, and the degree is very significant, concerning to the initial orbit of the space debris to avoid collision, it is usually 25% to 125%.
  • [1] Hu Xiaodong, Xu Yuanfei, Yao Jianhua, et al. Development of high power direct output semiconductor laser processing system[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2015, 44(7):1996-2001. (in Chinese)胡晓冬, 徐元飞, 姚建华,等. 大功率半导体直接输出激光加工系统开发[J]. 红外与激光工程, 2015, 44(7):1996-2001.
    [2] Wang Lijun, Peng Hangyu, Zhang Jun. Advance on high power diode laser coupling[J]. Chinese Optics, 2015, 8(4):517-534. (in Chinese)王立军, 彭航宇, 张俊. 大功率半导体激光合束进展[J]. 中国光学, 2015, 8(4):517-534.
    [3] Hong Yanji, Jin Xing, Chang Hao. Discussion of key problems in space based laser centimeter orbital debris removal[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2016, 45(2):1-6. (in Chinese)洪延姬, 金星, 常浩. 天基平台激光清除厘米级空间碎片关键问题探讨[J]. 红外与激光工程, 2016, 45(2):1-6.
    [4] Li Zhenwei, Zhang Tao, Zhang Nan, et al. High precision orientation of faint space objects[J]. Optics and Precision Engineering, 2015, 23(9):2627-2634. (in Chinese)李振伟, 张涛, 张楠,等. 暗弱空间目标的高精度定位[J]. 光学精密工程, 2015, 23(9):2627-2634.
    [5] Li Ming, Xue Li, Huang Chen, et al. Estimation of detection range for space debris laser ranging system based on efficient echo probability[J]. Optics and Precision Engineering, 2016, 24(2):260-267. (in Chinese)李明, 薛莉, 黄晨,等. 基于有效回波概率估计空间碎片激光测距系统作用距离[J]. 光学精密工程, 2016, 24(2):260-267.
    [6] Zhu Yin, Chen Hao, Xu Rong, et al. Optimized one-dimensional fluid mechanics model for laser cleaning up space debris[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2016, 45(S1):1-6. (in Chinese)朱殷, 陈浩, 徐融,等. 优化的一维激光清理空间碎片流体力学模型[J]. 红外与激光工程, 2016, 45(S1):1-6.
    [7] Apollonov V V. High power lasers for space debris elimination[J]. Chinese Optics, 2013, 6(2):187-195.
    [8] Mason J, Stupl J, Marshall W, et al. Orbital debris-debris collision avoidance[J]. Advances in Space Research, 2011, 48(10):1643-1655.
    [9] Levit C, Smith C, Stupl J, et al. LightForce:Photon pressure induced collision avoidance[C]//AMOS:Advanced Maui Optical and Space Surveillance Technologies Conference, 2012.
    [10] Stupl J, Faber N, Foster C, et al. LightForce photon-pressure collision avoidance:efficiency assessment on an entire catalogue of space debris[C]//AMOS:Advanced Maui Optical and Space Surveillance Technologies Conference, 2013.
    [11] Stupl J, Faber N, Foster C, et al. LightForce photon-pressure collision avoidance:updated efficiency analysis utilizing a highly parallel simulation approach[C]//AMOS:Advanced Maui Optical and Space Surveillance Conference, 2014.
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(582) PDF downloads(93) Cited by()

Related
Proportional views

Control strategy of space debris collision avoidance using ground based laser system

doi: 10.3788/IRLA201746.0329003
  • 1. State Key Laboratory of Astronautic Dynamics,Xi'an Satellite Control Center,Xi'an 710043,China

Abstract: The growing number of space debris threatens the flight safety of manned space station and satellites. In 2011, NASA proposed to use a continuous ground-based laser station irradiation to change orbit of space debris. The photon pressure is slight but durable, and accumulates to a considerable orbit change. The orbit change will avoid the possible collision. This method does not bring the space debris back into the atmosphere, but to prevent the collision. For the method, the spacecraft is no need to maneuver for space debris collision avoidance, and the mild photon pressure just need median power laser generator. Thus, the method gets widespread concern in recent years. However, the head-on irradiation control law in this method is simple, but not the best. It is necessary to design the optimal control law. Through the establishment of two point boundary value model to maximize the distance between two objects for control objectives, and then solving the optimality conditions, the optimal control problem is solved. The simulation shows that the modified control law has been optimized to improve the performance of collision avoidance, and the degree is very significant, concerning to the initial orbit of the space debris to avoid collision, it is usually 25% to 125%.

Reference (11)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return