Volume 47 Issue 11
Jan.  2019
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents

Wang Weizhu, Liu Zhiguo, Wang Shicheng, Liu Shuo. Evaluation of laser angle deception interference effect based on experiment[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2018, 47(11): 1106007-1106007(6). doi: 10.3788/IRLA201847.1106007
Citation: Wang Weizhu, Liu Zhiguo, Wang Shicheng, Liu Shuo. Evaluation of laser angle deception interference effect based on experiment[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2018, 47(11): 1106007-1106007(6). doi: 10.3788/IRLA201847.1106007

Evaluation of laser angle deception interference effect based on experiment

doi: 10.3788/IRLA201847.1106007
  • Received Date: 2018-06-05
  • Rev Recd Date: 2018-07-03
  • Publish Date: 2018-11-25
  • In order to realize the effective evaluation of the effect of laser angle deception, the laser angle deception interference effect evaluation system was constructed, and the structure and function of the target motion simulation subsystem, the laser guided missile simulation sub-system and the interference effect evaluation subsystem were introduced in detail. Combined with the interference effect evaluation method, the relevant experiment was designed. Through the detailed analysis of the experimental data, the interference effect was evaluated. In the experiment, when the laser pulse period was 50 000 microseconds, the interference laser was set up 2, 3, 4, and -3 microseconds ahead of guidance laser, and the solutions of point deviations were 154.14, 167.03, 174.93, and 0.52 meters respectively; When the laser pulse period was 51 200 microseconds, the interference laser was set up 2, -2, and 3 microseconds ahead of guidance laser, and the solutions of point deviations were 396.86, 0.53, and 396.86 meters respectively. The results show that the interference of the pilot emitter can be achieved when the interference pulse leading pulse enters the seeker gate simulator. Through this experiment, it was found that the seeker simulator tracks the interference of laser spot itself in laser angle deception interference, rather than the interference laser and indicating the laser energy center. The deviation of the placement point for the assessment of indicators, the interference effect were evaluated and analyzed, and the results can provide technical support for laser guidance and confrontation evaluation.
  • [1] Tong Zhongcheng, Sun Xiaoquan, Yang Xiwei, et al. Effective simulation on passive jam of laser-guiding-bomb[J]. Journal of Ballistics, 2008, 37(1):106-110. (in Chinese)童忠诚, 孙晓泉, 杨希伟, 等. 激光制导武器高重频干扰技术仿真研究[J]. 弹道学报, 2008, 37(1):106-110.
    [2] Li Shuanggang, Nie Jinsong, Li Hua. Effectiveness evaluation of angle spoofing interference for laser semi-active guided weapon[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2011, 40(1):41-45. (in Chinese)李双刚, 聂劲松, 李化. 对激光半主动制导武器的角度欺骗干扰的效能评估[J]. 红外与激光工程, 2011, 40(1):41-45.
    [3] Wang Jiang, Lin Wei, Wang Peng. Study on energy link of semi-active simulation system of laser semi-active guided weapon[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2011, 40(7):1230-1233. (in Chinese)王江, 林蔚, 王鹏. 激光半主动制导武器半实物仿真系统能量链接研究[J].红外与激光工程, 2011, 40(7):1230-1233.
    [4] Liu Mancang. Design and modeling of hardware-in-the-loop simulation system for laser guided weapon[D]. Beijing:Beijing Institute of Technology, 2010. (in Chinese)刘满仓. 激光制导武器半实物仿真系统设计与建模[D]. 北京:北京理工大学, 2010.
    [5] Wang Yunping, Zhao Changming, Li Yan. High-phase simulation test system for laser angle deception jamming[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2012, 41(5):1217-1222. (in Chinese)王云萍, 赵长明, 李岩. 激光角度欺骗干扰半实物仿真试验系统[J]. 红外与激光工程, 2012, 41(5):1217-1222.
    [6] Yu Guoquan, Guo Jin, Li Yan, et al. Precision analysis of indoor simulation system for laser angle deception jam[J]. Optics and Precision Engineering, 2013, 21(10):2610-2616. (in Chinese)于国权, 郭劲, 李岩, 等. 激光角度欺骗干扰内场仿真系统精度分析[J]. 光学精密工程, 2013, 21(10):2610-2616.
    [7] Yang Baoqing, Chen Yong. Study on evaluation method of laser angle spoofing jamming effect[J]. Application of Optoelectronic Technology, 2005, 20(4):63-66. (in Chinese)杨宝庆, 陈勇. 激光角度欺骗干扰效果评估方法研究[J]. 光电技术应用, 2005, 20(4):63-66.
    [8] Liu Yanyan, Yan Xiusheng, Gao Wenqing. Research on mathematical simulation of laser angle deception jamming[J]. Journal of China Institute of Electronic Science and Technology, 2011, 6(3):271-274. (in Chinese)刘严严, 闫秀生, 高文清. 激光角度欺骗干扰效果的数学仿真分析[J]. 中国电子科学研究院学报, 2011, 6(3):271-274.
    [9] GJB4972.1-2003. National Military Standard of the People's Republic of China[S], 2013. (in Chinese) GJB4972.1-2003. 中华人民共和国国家军用标准[S], 2013.
    [10] Xing Hui, Lei Ping, Ma Na. Study and experiment on anti-jamming technique of laser seeker[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2012, 41(2):461-465. (in Chinese)邢晖, 雷萍, 马娜. 激光导引头时序抗干扰技术分析及实验[J]. 红外与激光工程, 2012, 41(2):461-465.
    [11] Tong Zhongcheng. Simulation research on ahead-time of laser-angle-cheating jamming signal[J]. Acta Armamentarrii, 2008, 29(5):633-636. (in Chinese)童忠诚. 激光角度欺骗干扰信号超前时间的仿真研究[J]. 兵工学报, 2008, 29(5):633-636.
    [12] Li Shuanggang. Modeling simulation of laser signal admission under doppler condition[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2016, 45(1):0106003. (in Chinese)李双刚. 干扰条件下制导波门对激光信号录取的数学仿真[J]. 红外与激光工程, 2016, 45(1):0106003.
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(495) PDF downloads(47) Cited by()

Related
Proportional views

Evaluation of laser angle deception interference effect based on experiment

doi: 10.3788/IRLA201847.1106007
  • 1. Department of Control Engineering,Rocket Force University of Engineering,Xi'an 710025,China

Abstract: In order to realize the effective evaluation of the effect of laser angle deception, the laser angle deception interference effect evaluation system was constructed, and the structure and function of the target motion simulation subsystem, the laser guided missile simulation sub-system and the interference effect evaluation subsystem were introduced in detail. Combined with the interference effect evaluation method, the relevant experiment was designed. Through the detailed analysis of the experimental data, the interference effect was evaluated. In the experiment, when the laser pulse period was 50 000 microseconds, the interference laser was set up 2, 3, 4, and -3 microseconds ahead of guidance laser, and the solutions of point deviations were 154.14, 167.03, 174.93, and 0.52 meters respectively; When the laser pulse period was 51 200 microseconds, the interference laser was set up 2, -2, and 3 microseconds ahead of guidance laser, and the solutions of point deviations were 396.86, 0.53, and 396.86 meters respectively. The results show that the interference of the pilot emitter can be achieved when the interference pulse leading pulse enters the seeker gate simulator. Through this experiment, it was found that the seeker simulator tracks the interference of laser spot itself in laser angle deception interference, rather than the interference laser and indicating the laser energy center. The deviation of the placement point for the assessment of indicators, the interference effect were evaluated and analyzed, and the results can provide technical support for laser guidance and confrontation evaluation.

Reference (12)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return