Volume 47 Issue 11
Jan.  2019
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents

Luo Ruiyao, Wang Hongyan, Ning Yu, Ding Feng, Wan Guoxin, Xu Xiaojun. Numerical simulation of array laser guide star based adaptive optics wavefront sensing[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2018, 47(11): 1111003-1111003(9). doi: 10.3788/IRLA201847.1111003
Citation: Luo Ruiyao, Wang Hongyan, Ning Yu, Ding Feng, Wan Guoxin, Xu Xiaojun. Numerical simulation of array laser guide star based adaptive optics wavefront sensing[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2018, 47(11): 1111003-1111003(9). doi: 10.3788/IRLA201847.1111003

Numerical simulation of array laser guide star based adaptive optics wavefront sensing

doi: 10.3788/IRLA201847.1111003
  • Received Date: 2018-06-10
  • Rev Recd Date: 2018-07-20
  • Publish Date: 2018-11-25
  • A kind of array laser guide star (LGS) based adaptive optics (AO) system was independently proposed in purpose to overcome inherent problems in current wavefront sensing techniques. It can effectively eliminate focus anisoplanatism and improve its own wavefront sensing accuracy, drastically widen the scope of atmospheric turbulence that a LGS AO system can detect, and lower the requirement of an AO system for the brightness of LGSs. Its closed-loop working process was interpreted. Based on this working process, its simulation model was built and its wavefront sensing process was numerically simulated based on array LGS. At last, the accuracy of wavefront reconstruction was estimated and the errors of simulation was analyzed. Simulation results have shown that the accuracy of wavefront reconstruction is favorable and residual correction error is 11%, which invalidates the feasibility of using array LGS for wavefront sensing.
  • [1] Happer W, MacDonald G. JASON Report JSR-82-106[R]. MITRE Corp., 1983.
    [2] Rodenburg B, Mirhosseini M, Malik M, et al. Simulating thick atmospheric turbulence in the lab with application to orbital angular momentum communication[J]. New Journal of Physics, 2014, 16(3):033020.
    [3] Foy R, Labeyrie A. Letter to the editor feasibility of adaptive telescope with laser probe[J]. Astronomy Astrophysics, 1985, 152:29-31.
    [4] Yan Zhaojun, Yang Pengqian. Simulation of layer oriented multi-conjugate adaptive optics[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2016, 45(9):0918005. (in Chinese)
    [5] Fried D L. Focus anisoplanatism in the limit of infinitely many artificial-guide-star reference spots[J]. Journal of Optical Society of America A, 1995, 12(5):939-949.
    [6] Tyson R K. Principles of Adaptive Optics[M]. Boca Raton:CRC Press, 2007.
    [7] Wang Feng, Ye Yidong, Hu Xiaoyang, et al. Analysis of saturation of sodium laser guide star[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2012, 41(6):1471-1476. (in Chinese)
    [8] Jia Shui. Sodium laser guide star technique in adaptive imaging[J]. Laser Optoelectronics Progress, 2002, 39(4):10-13. (in Chinese)
    [9] Butterley T, Buscher D F, Love G D, et al. Sky-projected shack-hartmann laser guide star[C]//Proceedings of SPIE Astronomical Telescopes+ Instrumentation. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2004:966-973.
    [10] Butterley T, Love G, Wilson R, et al. A shack-hartmann wavefront sensor projected on to the sky with reduced focal anisoplanatism[J]. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2006, 368(2):837-843.
    [11] Lu Y H, Xie G, Zhang L, et al. High-energy all-solid-state sodium beacon laser with line width of 0.6 GHz[J]. Applied Physics B, 2015, 118(2):253-259.
    [12] Denman C A, Drummond J D, Eickhoff M L, et al. Characteristics of sodium guidestars created by the 50-watt FASOR and first closed-loop AO results at the starfire optical range[C]//Proceedings of SPIE Astronomical Telescopes+ Instrumentation. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2006, 62721L:62721L-1-12.
    [13] Gilles L, Ellerbroek B. Shack-hartmann wavefront sensing with elongated sodium laser beacons:centroiding versus matched filtering[J]. Applied Optics, 2006, 45(25):6568-6576.
    [14] Zhang Qiang, Jiang Wenhan, Xu Bing. Reconstruction of turbulent optical wavefront realized by Zernike polynomial[J]. Opto-Electronic Engineering, 1998, 25(6):15-19. (in Chinese)
    [15] Schmidt J D. Numerical Simulation of Optical Wave Propagation with Examples in MATLAB[M]. US:SPIE Press, 2010.
    [16] Qian Xianmei, Zhu Wenyue, Rao Ruizhong. Phase screen distribution for simulating laser propagation along an inhomogeneous atmospheric path[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2009, 58(9):6633-6639. (in Chinese)
    [17] Johansson E M, Gavel D T. Simulation of stellar speckle imaging[R]. Lawrence Livermore National Lab., CA, 1994.
    [18] Parenti R R, Sasiela R J. Laser-guide-star systems for astronomical applications[J]. Journal of Optical Society of America A, 1994, 11(1):288-309.
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(660) PDF downloads(53) Cited by()

Related
Proportional views

Numerical simulation of array laser guide star based adaptive optics wavefront sensing

doi: 10.3788/IRLA201847.1111003
  • 1. No. 95835 Unit of PLA,Malan 841700,China;
  • 2. College of Opto-Electric Science and Engineering,National University of Defense Technology,Changsha 410073,China

Abstract: A kind of array laser guide star (LGS) based adaptive optics (AO) system was independently proposed in purpose to overcome inherent problems in current wavefront sensing techniques. It can effectively eliminate focus anisoplanatism and improve its own wavefront sensing accuracy, drastically widen the scope of atmospheric turbulence that a LGS AO system can detect, and lower the requirement of an AO system for the brightness of LGSs. Its closed-loop working process was interpreted. Based on this working process, its simulation model was built and its wavefront sensing process was numerically simulated based on array LGS. At last, the accuracy of wavefront reconstruction was estimated and the errors of simulation was analyzed. Simulation results have shown that the accuracy of wavefront reconstruction is favorable and residual correction error is 11%, which invalidates the feasibility of using array LGS for wavefront sensing.

Reference (18)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return