Volume 44 Issue 9
Nov.  2015
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents

Cui Chengguang, Wang Shurong, Li Bo, Wang Junbo, Huang Yu. Study on the calibration for quantum efficiency of ultraviolet/visible NMOS linear image sensors[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2015, 44(9): 2844-2848.
Citation: Cui Chengguang, Wang Shurong, Li Bo, Wang Junbo, Huang Yu. Study on the calibration for quantum efficiency of ultraviolet/visible NMOS linear image sensors[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2015, 44(9): 2844-2848.

Study on the calibration for quantum efficiency of ultraviolet/visible NMOS linear image sensors

  • Received Date: 2015-01-12
  • Rev Recd Date: 2015-02-03
  • Publish Date: 2015-09-25
  • As a new type of ultraviolet-visible linear array image sensor, NMOS has been applied to ultraviolet remote sensing abroad, but its research is still less domestically at present. This thesis aims at calibrating quantum efficiency of NMOS liner image sensor, which permits further application at space ultraviolet remote sensing. On the basis of standard detector provided by NIST, a high-accuracy calibration system was established to research quantum efficiency of NMOS linear image sensor. The number of photos, received by NMOS linear image sensor, was calibrated directly in this paper. And the number of electrons was calculated according to the signal processor and signal readout circuit of NMOS linear array image sensor. Then quantum efficiency of NMOS liner image sensor in 250-700 nm spectral range was calibrated. The result shows that quantum efficiency of NMOS liner image sensor reaches 34%@275 nm and 80%@550 nm. Through uncertainty analysis of quantum efficiency, the combined uncertainty is determined as 2.5%.
  • [1] Mager R, Fricke W G, Burrows J P, et al. A new generation of hyperspectral remote sensing instrument[C]//SPIE, 1997, 3106: 84-94.
    [2]
    [3] Sierk B, Richter A, Rozanov A. Retrieval and monitoring of atmospheric trace gas concentrations in nadir and limb geometry using the space-borne sciamachy instrument[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2006, 120: 65-77.
    [4]
    [5]
    [6] Costa M J, Cervino M, Cattani E. Aerosol characterization and optical thickness retrievalsusing GOME and METEOSAT satellite data [J]. Meteorol Atoms Phys, 2002, 81: 289-298.
    [7] Li Bo, Wang Shurong, Wang Junbo. Optical design of space-based ultraviolet tracking and detailed reconnaissance system[J]. Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2013, 40(9): 0916003. (in Chinese) 李博, 王淑荣, 王俊博. 天基紫外跟踪详查光学系统设计[J]. 中国激光, 2013, 40(9): 0916003.
    [8]
    [9] Mark Weberl, John P Burrowsl, Richard P Cebula. Solar UV/VIS irradiance measurements between 1995 and 1997 -first results on proxy solar activity studies[J]. Solar Physics, 1998, 177: 63-77.
    [10]
    [11] Jin Young Choi. A comparison study of input ESD protection schemes utilizing NMOS, thyristor, and diode devices[J]. Communication and Network, 2010, 2: 11-25.
    [12]
    [13] Jerald W Harder, Juan Fontenal. The spectral irradiance monitor: measurement equations and calibration [J]. Solar Physics, 2005, 230: 169-204.
    [14]
    [15] Wang Rui, Wang Shurong, Guo Jin, et al. Calibration of high accuracy UV standard detector[J]. Optics and Precision Engineering, 2012, 20(8): 1696-1702. (in Chinese) 王锐, 王淑荣, 郭劲, 等.高精度紫外探测器的定标 [J]. 光学 精密工程, 2012, 20(8): 1696-1702.
    [16]
    [17] Chen Yinghang, Sui Zuoning, Sun Hongsheng, et al. Facility for calibration of ultraviolet and vacuum ultraviolet spectral irradiance[J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2013, 42(4): 998-1002. (in Chinese) 陈应航, 隋左宁, 孙红胜, 等. 紫外-真空紫外光谱辐照度校准系统[J]. 红外与激光工程, 2013, 42(4): 998-1002.
    [18]
    [19] Kohler R, Goebel R, Pellp R. Experimental procedures for the comparison of cryogenic radiometer at highest accuracy [J]. Metrologia, 1996, 33(6): 549-554.
    [20]
    [21] Wu Kun, Xue Song, Lu Qipeng. Simulation analysis and measurement of rotation angle repeatability for gating sine mechanism of SX-700 monochromator[J]. Optics and Precision Engineering, 2010, 18(1): 46-48. (in Chinese) 吴坤, 薛松, 卢启鹏. SX -700单色器光栅正弦机构转角重复精度的模拟分析与测量[J]. 光学 精密工程, 2010, 18(1): 46-48.
    [22]
    [23]
    [24] Chen Junhong, Yang Xiaoli. Research of detectors in UV communication [J]. Infrared and Laser Engineering, 2008, 37: 87-89. (in Chinese) 陈君洪, 杨小丽. 紫外通信中探测器的研究[J]. 红外与激光工程, 2008, 37: 87-89.
    [25] Yang Xiaohu, Wang Shurong, Huang Yu, et al. Spectral irradiance calibration research of the solar backscattered ultraviolet spectro-radiometer in air/vacuum conditions[J]. Acta Optica Sinaca, 2012, 32(1). (in Chinese) 杨小虎, 王淑荣, 黄煜, 等. 大气真空环境紫外臭氧垂直探测仪光谱辐照度定标研究[J]. 光学学报, 2012, 32(1).
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(424) PDF downloads(161) Cited by()

Related
Proportional views

Study on the calibration for quantum efficiency of ultraviolet/visible NMOS linear image sensors

  • 1. Changchun Institute of Optics,Fine Mechanics and Physics,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Changchun 130033,China;
  • 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China

Abstract: As a new type of ultraviolet-visible linear array image sensor, NMOS has been applied to ultraviolet remote sensing abroad, but its research is still less domestically at present. This thesis aims at calibrating quantum efficiency of NMOS liner image sensor, which permits further application at space ultraviolet remote sensing. On the basis of standard detector provided by NIST, a high-accuracy calibration system was established to research quantum efficiency of NMOS linear image sensor. The number of photos, received by NMOS linear image sensor, was calibrated directly in this paper. And the number of electrons was calculated according to the signal processor and signal readout circuit of NMOS linear array image sensor. Then quantum efficiency of NMOS liner image sensor in 250-700 nm spectral range was calibrated. The result shows that quantum efficiency of NMOS liner image sensor reaches 34%@275 nm and 80%@550 nm. Through uncertainty analysis of quantum efficiency, the combined uncertainty is determined as 2.5%.

Reference (25)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return